Session 2: Effects of Foreign Economic Influence on Sovereign Nations (in partnership with the Centre for International Private Enterprise (CIPE))
Description: Investment from authoritarian states is entering the Balkan region in a variety of often-opaque forms and methods. To ensure state resources are used transparently, effectively, and efficiently, and public policy decisions are made with citizen input, improving the rule of law and public governance is essential for economies to prosper. Countries with strong rule of law and responsive governance avoid the negative economic outcomes that burden countries characterized by corruption, state capture, and kleptocracy. Improving governance, strengthening the management and oversight of public funds, and building markets that are more competitive are each essential to build economies provide an opportunity for all citizens to succeed. Inclusive economic growth on a level playing field increases citizens’ trust in democratic institutions and processes. Transparency in capital investment and public policy decision-making will both democratize opportunity and fight the widespread and growing perception that liberal democracies and market economies are failing citizens
- Emerging markets seek out foreign direct investment as a way to boost economic growth. What is the difference between accepting foreign direct investment from the “democratic” capital and authoritarian capital?
- Given legitimate business reasons for offshore accounts and investor anonymity, how to strike the appropriate balance between transparency and business interests?
- What legal or regulatory mechanisms currently exist for citizens to ensure transparency and accountability of public servants and public policy decisions?
- EU investment into the Balkans is much higher than that of Russia or China, yet public opinion does not reflect this reality. What is causing the disconnect between the public’s perception of foreign investment and the reality?
That improving the rule of law is essential for building a sound and sustainable economy is today considered beyond question. Leaderships that would like to see their economies going global insist – at least declaratively – on strong rule of law. This would imply how they fully understand the importance of building robust democratic institutions.
When the countries of Central and Eastern Europe joined NATO and the European Union, it was believed how they would continue their positive democratic and economic transformation. Yet more than a decade later, the region has experienced a steady decline in democratic standards and governance practices. At the same time, economic – and to an extent, political – engagement of “outside powers” (i.e. Russia, China or Turkey) within the region expanded significantly.
Countries in the region are in constant risk from negative economic outcomes; caused (or contributed to) by corruption, state capture and kleptocracy. Improving governance, strengthening the management of public funds, and building more competitive markets is a key facet of economic development, and helps ensure that economies provide opportunity for all to succeed. This would, in turn, increase citizens’ trust in democratic institutions and processes, and help shape a response to the contemporary challenges facing their society.
- CIPE, 2017, “2016 Annual Report”, Washington, D.C.: Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE)
- Kim Bettcher, 2017, “How Good Governance Got a Bad Name – and Why Governance Still Matters”
- Center for Study of Democracy, “Improving Democratic Governance to Unlock Growth in Southeast Europe: Dialogue on Current Policies and Future Perspectives”
- Heather A. Conley, James Mina, Ruslan Stefanov and Martin Vladimirov, 2016, “The Kremlin Playbook”, Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies
- SELDI Network web site
Previous BSF Sessions on the Similar Topics: